Drawing for DELMAS

USPTO serial 79050684

DELMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3718687Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 1, 2009
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Maritime transport; freight ship transport; storage of goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 9, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 23, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 23, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 7, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 26, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 30, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 27, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 29, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 29, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 27, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance