Drawing for DELMAS

USPTO serial 79050684

DELMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3718687Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 1, 2009
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Maritime transport; freight ship transport; storage of goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 9, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 23, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 26, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 30, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 29, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance