Drawing for OREGE

USPTO serial 79050915

OREGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3587359Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OREGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna L. King

Anna L. King Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3600Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for the treatment, purification, secondary treatment, disinfection, decontamination and pollution control of water, of effluents from industry, wine production or agriculture, of sludge, of soils and of ground water, chemicals for dewatering sludge and soilsACTIVE
011Fixed and movable water treatment units for treatment, purification, secondary treatment, disinfection, decontamination and pollution control of water and industrial effluents, for industrial use and agricultural use; and dewatering machines for use in treatment of sludge and soilsACTIVE
037Repair and maintenance of water treatment units and dewatering machinesACTIVE
040Services of treatment, purification, secondary treatment, disinfection, decontamination and pollution control of water, of effluents from industry, wine production or agriculture, of sludge, of soils and of ground water; services of dewatering sludge and soilsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 18, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 10, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 22, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 23, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 23, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 10, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 25, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance