Drawing for PLAY HARDER

USPTO serial 79050926

PLAY HARDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAY HARDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney L. Skoglund

Rodney L. Skoglund Renner Kenner Greive Bobak Taylor & WeberFirst National Tower, Fourth FloorAkron, OH 44308UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Sporting articles, namely, protective pads and leg, arm and chest guards for use in sports; shin guards and shin pads for use in sports; shin guards and shin pads for use in soccer; ankle protectors for sports; achilles tendon protectors for sports; knee guards for athletic use; elbow guards for athletic use; balls for use in sports; soccer ballsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 4, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 29, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 17, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 6, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 3, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 3, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 13, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance