Drawing for DELMAS

USPTO serial 79050985

DELMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602705Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Maritime transport, namely, transport by boat; river transport, namely, transport by boat; maritime and river transport brokerage; freighting, namely, global transportation of freight of others by all available means; and storage of goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 5, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 14, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 23, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance