Drawing for EZSTART

USPTO serial 79053990

EZSTART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3534388Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 18, 2008
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZSTART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

Jeffrey H. Kaufman Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for industrial use, namely, grinding, fine grinding and floor polishing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Grinding instruments and tools, namely, hand-operated grinding wheels, grindstones, emery grinding wheels and manually-operated grinding tools and grinding implements for the treatment of concrete, wood, natural stones, terrazzo and materials for filling and coatingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 1, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 14, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 19, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 19, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance