USPTO serial 79053990
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
Jeffrey H. Kaufman Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for industrial use, namely, grinding, fine grinding and floor polishing machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Grinding instruments and tools, namely, hand-operated grinding wheels, grindstones, emery grinding wheels and manually-operated grinding tools and grinding implements for the treatment of concrete, wood, natural stones, terrazzo and materials for filling and coating | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |