USPTO serial 79054040
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Hudgins
Christie Baty Hudgins Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pumps, namely, vacuum pumps for pump machines and units, and for combined pump, macerating and/or purification machines and units [ ; filters for vacuum pump machines and for combined pump, macerating and/or purification machines ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Machines, apparatus, devices and installations for water outlets and for the clarification of water, waste water and sewage, namely, water, waste water and sewage sucking, macerating and/or purification units [; and parts and fittings therefor, sold together as a unit ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 13, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |