Drawing for VACUUMARATOR

USPTO serial 79054040

VACUUMARATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3631601Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 2, 2009
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VACUUMARATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christie Baty Hudgins

Christie Baty Hudgins Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pumps, namely, vacuum pumps for pump machines and units, and for combined pump, macerating and/or purification machines and units [ ; filters for vacuum pump machines and for combined pump, macerating and/or purification machines ]ACTIVE
011Machines, apparatus, devices and installations for water outlets and for the clarification of water, waste water and sewage, namely, water, waste water and sewage sucking, macerating and/or purification units [; and parts and fittings therefor, sold together as a unit ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 13, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 13, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Apr 9, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 6, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 6, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 23, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 29, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 16, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 21, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 12, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 1, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 2, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 26, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance