USPTO serial 79054177
LAKSHMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3701796Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2009
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAKSHMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREET22ND FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103-3207Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes; nutritional additives for medical purposes for use in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption; dietary and nutritional supplements; vitamin and mineral preparation for use as ingredients in the food and pharmaceutical industry; eye drops; disinfectants for hygienic purposes; medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners; medicated hair care preparations; bath salts for medical purposes; medicated baby powders; nutritional oils not for food or cosmetic purposes; deodorants for clothing or textiles; herbal teas for medical purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, roasted, powdered, granulated, or in drinks; artificial coffee or vegetable preparations for use as coffee, namely, coffee substitutes; prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; cocoa, roasted, powdered, granulated, or in drinks, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; tea; green tea; black tea; herbal teas for food purposes; iced tea; beverages made of tea; tea bags; tea for infusions; herbal infusions; white sugar; sugar substitutes; husked rice; rice flour; tapioca; tapioca flour for food; sago; breakfast cereals; cereal based energy bars not for use as a meal replacement; cereal-based snack foods; processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack for or ingredient for making other foods; bread; pastries; sugarless sweets; candies, being sweets; sugar-free chewing gum; honey for food; bread rolls; pies; cakes; biscuits; crackers; protein reduced and gluten free flour and bread; ice cream; cooking salt; wine vinegar; sauces; spices; seasonings; flavourings, other than essential oils | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAKSHMI HOLDING S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by LAKSHMI SAS DI CANTERI FRANCO
- Other trademarks owned by LAKSHMI SAS DI CANTERI FRANCO
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LAKSHMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |