Drawing for AQUASULF

USPTO serial 79054898

AQUASULF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3631643Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 2, 2009
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUASULF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Patch

Andrew J. Patch YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON STREETSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Salts in the nature of sodium chloride for salt bath solution surface treatment and coating of metal parts and materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Surface treatment and coating of metal parts and materials, for increasing their resistance to seizure and adhesion, lowering their friction coefficient, strengthening the adherence of lubricating films, and for improving their slip and fit properties; electrolytic salt bath solution treatment of metal parts and materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 8, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 5, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 14, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 14, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 8, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 8, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 3, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD
Aug 1, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 2, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 18, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Jul 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance