USPTO serial 79055265
HELIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3972547Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HELIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Diamond
David J. Diamond Richard Law Group, Inc.5910 N Central Expy Ste 325Dallas, TX 75206United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Centrifugal pumps being machines, in particular for building installations, for water supply and disposal, for cleaning apparatus and installations [ as well as centrifugal pumps fitted to machine tools ], except pumps for medical purposes and air pumps; centrifugal pumps for heating installations; centrifugal pumps and centrifugal pump installations for drinking water and service water, [ for waste water, ] for groundwater, [ for treatment of waste water] and for drainage; all aforementioned goods not for purposes of creating, monitoring, measuring and/or controlling vacuum environments, not for purposes of cryogenic engineering; * excluding all goods designed or are intended to be used only in laboratories or designed or are intended to be used only for water purification only for laboratory use * | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computers for controlling and/or regulating individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps for building installations, for water supply and disposal, for cleaning apparatus and installations [ as well as individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps fitted to machine tools ], except pumps for medical purposes and air pumps, individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps for heating installations, individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps and centrifugal pump installations for drinking and industrial water, [ for waste water, ] for groundwater, [ for treatment of waste water ] and for drainage; software for controlling and/or regulating individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps for building installations, for water supply and disposal, for cleaning apparatus and installations [ as well as individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps fitted to machine tools ], except pumps for medical purposes and air pumps, individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps for heating installations, individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps and centrifugal pump installations for drinking and industrial water, [ for waste water, ] for groundwater, [ for treatment of waste water ] and for drainage; temperature regulating apparatus in the nature of temperature controllers for centrifugal pumps for building installations, for water supply and disposal, for cleaning apparatus and installations [ as well as individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps fitted to machine tools ], except pumps for medical purposes and air pumps, individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps for heating installations, individual and/or multiple centrifugal pumps and centrifugal pump installations for drinking and industrial water, [ for waste water, ] for groundwater, [ for treatment of waste water ] and for drainage; all aforementioned goods not for purposes of creating, monitoring, measuring and/or controlling vacuum environments, not for purposes of cryogenic engineering; * all aforementioned goods not for purposes of creating, monitoring, measuring and/or controlling vacuum environments, not for purposes of cryogenic engineering; excluding all goods designed or are intended to be used only in laboratories or designed or are intended to be used only for water purification only for laboratory use * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Servatius Schneiders
- Other trademarks owned by Servatius Schneiders
- Other trademarks owned by Servatius Schneiders
- Other trademarks owned by WILO SE
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HELIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 27, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |