Drawing for D.I.D

USPTO serial 79057607

D.I.D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3742600Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 26, 2010
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with D.I.D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kumiko Ide

Kumiko Ide Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian LLP1250 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 850Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine parts, namely, roller chains * not for land vehicles * and silent chains * not for land vehicles * for industrial machines and not for land vehicles; drive chains and transmission chains for machines and not for land vehicles; machine parts, namely, chains for conveyors; power transmissions and gearings for machines not for land vehicles; conveyor machines; loading and unloading machinesACTIVE
012Chains for bicycles; chains for motorcycles; chains for automobiles; chains for land vehicles, namely, transmission chains; [ power transmission belts for land vehicles; ] drive and driven sprockets for land vehicles; [ cam sprockets for land vehicles; ] power transmissions and gears for land vehicles; wheels for [ vehicles ] [ aircraft, ] * automobiles, two-wheeled motor vehicles; * [ and bicycles; ] rims [ and spokes ] for [ vehicle wheels ] * automobiles * * AND * two-wheeled motor vehicles [ and bicycles; ] * component parts for the aforementioned goodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 11, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 11, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 26, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 26, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 26, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 26, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 19, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 14, 2017COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Aug 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 11, 2017LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Jun 2, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 4, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 4, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 22, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 26, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 26, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 5, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 14, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 1, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 18, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance