Drawing for V-BY-ONE

USPTO serial 79057777

V-BY-ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3676625Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2009
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V-BY-ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T. J. Weigell

Charles T. J. Weigell FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electric wires and cables; telecommunication devices and apparatus, namely, cables, exchanges, switches, receivers, and transmitters; integrated circuits; other electronic machines, apparatus and their parts, namely, electric or magnetic meters and testers in the nature of circuit testers, electric meters, magnetometers [ ; power distribution or control machines and apparatus, namely, electrical power distribution units, power controllers and amplifiers, and electrical power supplies ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 17, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 3, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 7, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 6, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 20, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 18, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance