USPTO serial 79057952
BIOFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3722496Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BIOFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Salzburg, AT
Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
AT
Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
AT
Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebeccah Gan
Rebeccah Gan WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, L.L.P.1030 15th Street, NW Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Domestic fireplaces; heating apparatus for solid, [ liquid or gaseous fuels, ] namely, fireplace inserts in the nature of fuel burners, wood burning stoves and tile ovens for baking; structural parts for the aforesaid goods, namely, ceramic tiles as parts of ovens and stoves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT Gesellschaft für kreative; Produktentwicklung Gesellschaft m.b.H.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named BIOFIRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |