Drawing for AMTEC

USPTO serial 79058080

AMTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3876332Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 16, 2010
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical handling apparatus, namely, machines and control apparatus for machines for conducting and evaluating chemical analyses and for conducting and evaluating chemical synthesesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Tubular reactors for catalytic reactionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Maintenance and repair of reactor systems comprising miniaturized high-throughput screening and testing reactor systems and micro-scale pilot plant systems used for material and catalyst testing, mechanical handling apparatus, namely, machines and control apparatus for machines for conducting and evaluating chemical analyses and for conducting and evaluating chemical syntheses, machines and mechanical equipment and mechanical apparatus for use in the chemical industry, namely, micro-scale pilot plant systems used for material and catalyst testing, machines and mechanical equipment and mechanical apparatus for research purposes in the field of chemistry, pharmacy and materials research, namely, micro-scale pilot plant systems used for material and catalyst testing, and tubular reactors for catalytic reactions; building inspection for modernization and optimization purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Remote monitoring of control and safety systems of miniaturized high-throughput screening and testing reactor systems and micro-scale pilot plant systems used for material and catalyst testing for technical development, process optimization, and industrial analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 6, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 7, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 7, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 23, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 23, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 14, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 16, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 13, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 12, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 15, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance