Drawing for SMART'IN

USPTO serial 79058651

SMART'IN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3778187Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 20, 2010
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART'IN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward Ave., Ste. 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper and cardboard, namely, security paper, printing paper, semi-processed paper and cardboard containing safety features to protect against counterfeiting and forgery; secure paper and cardboard for the production of security or identity documents, diplomas or official titles, access cards or tickets, fiduciary documents, and enabling the identification, authentication and the traceability of the said documentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 1, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 28, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 25, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 25, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 30, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 4, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 20, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 26, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 11, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 9, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance