USPTO serial 79058836
NETVIEWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3995730Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2011
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETVIEWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
76133 Karlsruhe, DE
76133 Karlsruhe, DE
76133 Karlsruhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham Burns & Levinson LLP125 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely, software for the purposes of and in connection with unified communications, visual communications in realtime, web-conferencing and collaboration, desktop-sharing, remote-support- and control-services, online meetings, respectively realized via an intranet network or the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of computer hardware, maintenance, design and updates of software, respectively for the purposes of and in connection with unified communications, visual communications in realtime, web-conferencing and collaboration, desktop-sharing, remote-support- and control-services, online meetings, respectively realized via an intranet network or the internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |