USPTO serial 79059560
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
70376 Stuttgart, DE
70376 Stuttgart, DE
70376 Stuttgart, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Valves being parts of combustion engines; Flow control equipments, namely, parts of machines for mechanical influence of the flow of turbines for combustion engines, namely, valves, flaps, fix, and adjustable guide vanes; Machines, namely, air compressors and compressors for machines, namely, exhaust turbochargers for the charging of combustion engines, mechanical apparatus, namely, spiral casings, turbine and compressor wheels, wastegate valves, flaps, fix, and adjustable guide vanes, for influencing flow in exhaust turbochargers of combustion engines; Flow controllers, namely, regulators being parts of machines, pressure regulators, air regulators, valves, flaps, and adjustable guide vanes, all for exhaust gases of combustion engines; Guide blades being a component part of exhaust turbochargers of combustion engines; Actuators, namely, hydraulic vales, linear, and pneumatic actuators and component parts thereof consisting of adjustment devices for exhaust turbochargers of combustion engines; Shut-off valves for exhaust turbocharger of combustion engines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |