USPTO serial 79059864
IKI BEAUTY ESSENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IKI BEAUTY ESSENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Gloves for massage; horsehair gloves for massage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Sponges and brushes for cleaning purposes; articles for cleaning purposes; toilet cases; dusters; sponges for household purposes; abrasive sponges; abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; abrasive sponges for peeling the skin; bath sponges; cleaning sponges; toilet sponges; sponges for household use; cloths for cleaning; chamois leather for cleaning; hand-operated cleaning instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROZZI INDUSTRIE S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by ARIX S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BROZZI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named IKI BEAUTY ESSENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |