USPTO serial 79060149
SPIRSIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3718752Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2009
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SPIRSIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet G. Ricciuti
Janet G. Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC1830 S Street NWWashington, DC 20009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Non-metal pipes and tubes, namely, [ rubber, ] silicone [, elastomer, thermoplastic ] tubes and pipes; non-metal flexible hoses for use in the food, pharmaceutical, biotechnological, cosmetic, chemical and related general processing industries [ ; non-metal connectors and couplings for non-metal pipes and tubes; non-metal nozzles sold as an integral component of the above non-metal pipes and tubes; non-metal connectors and couplings for use with non-metal flexible hoses that are used in the food, pharmaceutical, biotechnological, cosmetic, chemical and related general processing industries; non-metal nozzles sold as an integral component of the above non-metal flexible hoses ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |