Drawing for AQUACLEAN

USPTO serial 79060597

AQUACLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4095022Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 7, 2012
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUACLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK A. STEINER

DANIEL KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEURESN SC1000 N WATER STREET SUITE 1800MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Sanitary apparatus and installations, namely, toilets equipped with perineal showersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 26, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 14, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 7, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 7, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 3, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 2, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 2, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 4, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 8, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 8, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 8, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 8, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 28, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 15, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 15, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 27, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Apr 27, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 3, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance