USPTO serial 79060871
DRIVEN BY INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVEN BY INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Transmission gears for machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Gears for land vehicles, in particular, power shift gears, power dividers, gear attachments, step-down gears, transmissions, planetary gears, differential gears and hydraulic gears; axles for land vehicles, in particular, steering axles, planetary steering axles, rigid axles, planetary rigid axles, planetary full floating axles, portal axles and tandem axles; automobile bodies; transmission chains for land vehicles; brake for vehicles; clutches and automatic couplings in the nature of transmission mechanisms for land motor vehicles; torsion bar for automobiles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of motor vehicle drive components for others, in particular, drive components for self-propelled work machines, motor vehicles and special-purpose vehicles for use in construction, agriculture, forestry and mining; custom manufacture of motor vehicle brake systems for others, in particular, brake systems for self-propelled work machines, motor vehicles and special-purpose vehicles for use in construction, agriculture, forestry and mining | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Product development of motor vehicle drive components for others, in particular, drive components for self-propelled work machines, motor vehicles and special-purpose vehicles for use in construction, agriculture, forestry and mining; product development of motor vehicle brake systems for others, in particular, brake systems for self-propelled work machines, motor vehicles and special-purpose vehicles for use in construction, agriculture, forestry and mining | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NAF Neunkirchener Achsenfabrik AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DRIVEN BY INNOVATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |