USPTO serial 79060911
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
"L.V.D. COMPANY",; Naamloze vennootschap
B-8560 WEVELGEM (GULLEGEM), BE
Other trademarks owned by "L.V.D. COMPANY",; Naamloze vennootschap
"L.V.D. COMPANY",; Naamloze vennootschap
B-8560 WEVELGEM (GULLEGEM), BE
Other trademarks owned by "L.V.D. COMPANY",; Naamloze vennootschap
"L.V.D. COMPANY", Naamloze vennootschap
B-8560 WEVELGEM (GULLEGEM), BE
Other trademarks owned by "L.V.D. COMPANY", Naamloze vennootschap
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
James C. Wray Cermak Nakajima & McGowan LLP2000 Duke Street, Suite 300Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for metal fabrication, namely, machines for working metals by cutting, profiling, punching, bending and forming, including hydraulic, electronic and pneumatic presses for all industries, sheet metal working machines; machines for sheet metal and plate metal working, profiling, punching, bending and forming, namely, computer numerically controlled CNC turret punch presses, cutting machines, press brakes, guillotine shears, cutting machines and computer aided machining CAM programming software sold in conjunction therewith | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |