Drawing for MATO

USPTO serial 79060913

MATO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3810960Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006CONVEYOR BELT FASTENERS MADE PRIMARILY OF METALSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
007MACHINES FOR FASTENING DRIVE AND CONVEYOR BELTS, NAMELY, BELT LACERS AND HAMMER INSTALLATION MACHINES; MACHINES FOR ASSEMBLING DRIVE AND CONVEYOR BELT RODS; BELT TENSIONING MACHINES; BELT PLANING MACHINES; BAND CUTTING MACHINES AND MACHINES TO PREVENT THE BAND FROM UNDULATING; PNEUMATIC PUMPS; POWER OPERATED LUBRICATING PUMPS; POWER OPERATED GREASE GUNSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
008HAND OPERATED LUBRICATING PUMPS; HAND OPERATED GREASE GUNS; HAND TOOLS FOR FASTENING DRIVE AND CONVEYOR BELTS, NAMELY, MANUAL BELT LACING MACHINES, HAMMER FASTENER INSTALLATION TOOLS, BELT SKIVERS, SCREW PIN INSERTION TOOLS, HAMMER DRIVE PINS, WAVE AND BOW STOPS, BELT MARKERS, BELT KNIVES, BELT MARKING PINS, WIRE CUTTERS, HAND BELT SKIVER AND CLAMP-ON HANDLES FOR HANDLING BELTS; HAND OPERATED BELT TENSIONERS, BELT PLANES, BAND CUTTERS AND TOOLS USED TO PREVENT THE BAND FROM UNDULATINGSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017HIGH PRESSURE FLEXIBLE PIPES NOT OF METAL; SYNTHETIC MATERIAL ARMORED PIPESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
022[ CONVEYOR BELT FASTENERS WITH SEALING ACTION MADE PRIMARILY OF NON-METAL, NAMELY, SYNTHETIC MATERIAL ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 29, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 19, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 21, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 24, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 29, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Mar 25, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 24, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 24, 201671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Feb 18, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 28, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 1, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 4, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2013INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
May 4, 2011INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 6, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 6, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 4, 2010COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jul 30, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 16, 2010AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Jul 16, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 28, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 22, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 26, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 26, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 25, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 25, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 20, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance