Drawing for WATERLILY

USPTO serial 79061037

WATERLILY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3661150Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 28, 2009
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERLILY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan D. Adams

Bryan D. Adams Huntsman International, LLC.10003 Woodloch Forest DriveHuntsman - Legal DepartmentThe Woodlands, TX 77380

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry for the manufacture of foams and plastics for furniture, bedding and mattressesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 21, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 4, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 24, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 23, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 5, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Nov 27, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance