USPTO serial 79061155
IQFN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3763325Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2010
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IQFN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PETER HOCHBERG
D. PETER HOCHBERG D. PETER HOCHBERG, CO., L.P.A.1940 EAST 6TH STREET - 6TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric and electronic components, namely, circuit boards, integrated circuit modules, integrated circuits, integrated circuit packages and circuit board components, namely, resistors, capacitors, transistors, electrical inductors, diodes, structured semiconductor wafers, semiconductor memories, memory chips, microprocessors and electronic circuits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |