USPTO serial 79061492
TULLÏA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TULLÏA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved meat; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, vegetable juices for cooking; preserved beans, peas, lentils and soya beans; soups; preserved olives, pickles; milk and milk products, namely milk desserts, yoghurts, drinking yoghurts, cream (dairy cream), whipped cream, butter, cheese, milk beverages (milk predominating); edible oils and fats; jellies, jams, compotes, marmalades; processed nuts and processed grains, dried fruits, fruit pulps; hazelnut spreads, prepared nuts, processed peanuts, prepared pistachio pastes; eggs, powdered eggs; supplementary food products, not for medical purposes, mostly consisting of proteins and also containing carbohydrates, minerals, amino acids, trace elements, fatty acids and pollen; potato chips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, coffee or cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages, macaroni, meat pies, vermicelli, pastries, petit fours, tarts, cakes; desserts made of flour; honey, propolis; flavourings for foods; yeast, baking-powder; flavouring additives for non-nutritional purposes, any kind of flour, semolina, starch; sugar, powdered sugar; teas, iced tea; confectioneries, chocolates, biscuits, crackers, waffles, chewing gum, ice cream, edible ices; salt, cereals and preparations made of cereals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |