CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SPEEDMAX

USPTO serial 79061557

SPEEDMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3910270Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 25, 2011
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

John J. O'Malley Volpe and Koenig, P.C.30 S. 17th Street, Suite 1600Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, nautical, surveying, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking being supervision, lifesaving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, conductivity meters and flow meters; apparatus and instruments for conducting, distributing, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electric conductors, electric transformers, electric accumulators, voltage regulators, electrical controllers, and electrical switches; measuring and analysis apparatus for determining physical quantities, in particular pressure, flow, humidity, viscosity, acoustic velocity, density, concentration and temperature, namely, pressure gauges, flow meters, measuring apparatus for temperature and humidity levels in gases, fluids and solid substances, velocity of sound meters, namely, sensors for determining the velocity of sound waves and meters for measuring the speed of soundSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Business consulting and information servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Consultancy in the field of computers; technology research in the fields of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, chemistry, food, water and waste water, namely, engineering services for the construction of water treatment and purification plans, solid waste treatment plants and other municipal infrastructure facilities, energy efficiency, and mechanical engineering; engineeringSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 17, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 1, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 1, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2009IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Jan 28, 2009IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance