USPTO serial 79062096
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wuxi Sunmart Science and Technology Co., Ltd
Jiangsu Province, CN
Other trademarks owned by Wuxi Sunmart Science and Technology Co., Ltd
Wuxi Sunmart; Science and Technology Co., Ltd
Jiangsu Province, CN
Other trademarks owned by Wuxi Sunmart; Science and Technology Co., Ltd
Wuxi Sunmart; Science and Technology Co., Ltd
Jiangsu Province, CN
Other trademarks owned by Wuxi Sunmart; Science and Technology Co., Ltd
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal floating containers for commercial use; non-metal containers for commercial usage, namely, commercial storage and transport; non-metallic closures for containers; non-metal and non-masonry reservoirs, namely, fluid storage tanks; packaging containers of plastic | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |