USPTO serial 79062162
MISS SELFRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISS SELFRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Articles of clothing, namely, blouses, shirts, T-shirts, dresses, jumpers, cardigans, skirts, trousers, pants, jackets, coats, scarves, gloves, lingerie, camisoles, nightwear, bikinis, swimsuits, tops, leather jackets, blazers, playsuits, jeans, vests, tube tops, suits, shorts, underwear, socks, leggings, belts and hosiery; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals, pumps, slippers and casual shoes; headgear, namely, hats and caps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |