Drawing for NANOMAX

USPTO serial 79062335

NANOMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3667021Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 11, 2009
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NANOMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne Abelman

Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Shampoos; hair conditioners; non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; non-medicinal preparations for hair and scalp care in the form of shampoos, hair conditioners or treatments; hair lotions; cosmetics; hair treatments, namely, shampoos and conditioners for application in nanomolecular form; reparatory treatment products for application on the hair utilizing nanomolecular hair repair treatment systems, namely, non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jul 22, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 18, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 11, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 11, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 17, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 11, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 26, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 17, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 5, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 31, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 18, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance