Drawing for WALL TOP

USPTO serial 79062888

WALL TOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3924815Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 1, 2011
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WALL TOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

DUANE M BYERS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 NORTH GLEBE ROADSUITE 1100ARLINGTON, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, hard drives, network adaptors, switches, routers, hubs, servers, central processing units and mouse; Blank magnetic data carriers; Blank optical recording carriers, namely, compact discs, CD-ROMS, optical disks, and video magnetic tapes; Data processing equipment and electronic calculators; Computers; Personal computers; Computer software for connecting retail stores and/or online stores to a computer network; Computer software for retail inventory management; Computer software for operating system programs; Computer software for compiling and analyzing financial data; Computer hardware; Microprocessors; Office machines, namely, data processing machines and electronic calculating machines; Computer screen filters; Integrated circuits; Cards for integrated circuits; Blank smart cards; Parts, components and accessories, namely, computer printers, computer headsets, ear sets, namely, ear buds, computer speakers, digital cameras for computers, computer disc drives, computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives, blank portable hard drives, computer cables; Electronic game programs; Video game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; Video game interactive remote control units; Video game joysticks; Televisions; Electronic publications, namely, books and manuals featuring personal computers, personal computer networks, and personal computer software utilities for office, sales and warehouse management, recorded on computer media; none of the foregoing goods being designed to be mounted on a wallSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 12, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 6, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 6, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 17, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 29, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance