Drawing for POWERISE

USPTO serial 79062909

POWERISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3799664Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 8, 2010
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with POWERISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrin Lewertoff

Katrin Lewertoff Lewertoff IP Law Group, LLC16 East 34th Street18th FloorNew York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[METAL WORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, CUTTING MACHINES, DRILLING MACHINES, LAPPING MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES AND POLISHING MACHINES; WOODWORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, CUTTING MACHINES, DRILLING MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES AND POLISHING MACHINES; PLASTIC WORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, CUTTING MACHINES, DRILLING MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES AND POLISHING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, NAMELY, FILLING MACHINES AND CAPPING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR AGRICULTURE, NAMELY, COMBINE HARVESTERS AND FIELD WORKING MACHINES IN THE NATURE OF TRACTOR-TOWED IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, TILLERS, BALE CHOPPERS, BALE SHREDDERS, BALE WRAPPERS, BALERS, ROW CULTIVATORS, FERTILIZER DISTRIBUTION MACHINES, SPREADERS, MULCHERS, SEEDERS, PLANTERS, SOWERS, PLANTING DRILLS, COMBINES, SPRAYERS, REAPERS AND ROLLERS; MACHINES FOR MINE WORKING, NAMELY, MINE BORERS, EARTH MOVING MACHINES, BELT CONVEYORS, CONVEYOR LINES, STAGED AND SEGMENTED CONVEYORS, AND CRANES; TEXTILE MACHINES, NAMELY, REELING MACHINES, BALLING MACHINES AND PACKAGING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR THE BEVERAGE INDUSTRY, NAMELY, BEVERAGE PACKAGING MACHINES, FILLING MACHINES AND CAPPING MACHINES; CONSTRUCTION MACHINES, NAMELY, WHEEL LOADERS, EXCAVATORS, PAVERS IN THE NATURE OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT PAVING MACHINES, MOTORIZED GRADERS, COMPACTORS AND DUMPERS; PACKING MACHINES, NAMELY, FILLING MACHINES, CLOSING MACHINES, CAPPING MACHINES AND DOSING SYSTEMS; MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, TURNING MACHINES AND DRILLING MACHINES;] APPARATUS FOR TRANSMISSION OF POWER, NAMELY, HYDRAULIC, LINEAR, PNEUMATIC AND GEARED ACTUATORS; [AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, COMBINE HARVESTERS, FIELDWORKING MACHINES, SEED DRILLS AND INCORPORATORS;] ELECTRICAL PNEUMATIC, HYDRAULIC AND HYDRO-PNEUMATIC ACTUATORS WITH AND WITHOUT LOCKS FOR COVERS AND HOODS, IN PARTICULAR FOR SAFETY, ANTISPLASH AND SOUND-DAMPING HOODS, FOR MACHINE CASINGS AND MAINTENANCE FLAPS, AND FOR AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS SUCH AS TRACTORS, COMBINE HARVESTERS AND FIELD-WORKING MACHINESACTIVE
012[VEHICLES, NAMELY, LAND VEHICLES, AIRPLANES AND BOATS;] STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR AUTOMOBILES[, BOATS AND AIRPLANES]ACTIVE
020[FURNITURE, MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES OF WOOD, CORK, OR OF PLASTICS]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 3, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Sep 3, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jun 4, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Feb 8, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 8, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 8, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 4, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 11, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 8, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 28, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 28, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 13, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2016PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jul 8, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 1, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 8, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 27, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 15, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 9, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance