Drawing for AQUIS

USPTO serial 79063201

AQUIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3761405Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 16, 2010
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William D. Breneman

WILLIAM D. BRENEMAN BRENEMAN & GEORGES3150 COMMONWEALTH AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22305-2712UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Electromechanical apparatus for the preparation of beverages and liquid food for domestic and commercial use, namely, electrical coffee extracting machines and electrical coffee grinding machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Devices for domestic and commercial water treatment, namely, water filtering units, water purifiers, ultraviolet water sterilization units, water cartridge filtration units, reverse osmosis filtration units, water ionizers, water filters and structural parts of the aforementioned goods; electric espresso machines; electric coffee machines, namely, electric coffee makersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 4, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 13, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 8, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 21, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 21, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 22, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 24, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Feb 27, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Feb 18, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 15, 2018MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 17, 2017PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jun 13, 2017PR75RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 71 & 15
Jun 13, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2016PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Dec 13, 2016REINREINSTATED
Dec 13, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 21, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 14, 2016715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 14, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 5, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Apr 19, 2011RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION
Apr 19, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2011PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7
Jan 28, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 19, 2011AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Jan 19, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 29, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 17, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 27, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance