USPTO serial 79063736
ERGOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3814602Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERGOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newcastle Upon Tyne, GB
Newcastle Upon Tyne, GB
Newcastle Upon Tyne, GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. McKee
Bruce W. McKee McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC801 Grand AvenueSuite 3200Des Moines, IA 50309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Mattresses, bed mattresses, beds, and pillows all not used for vehicles on land, in the air, and on water | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ergo Flex Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ergo Flex Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ergo Flex Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ERGO FLEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ERGOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |