Drawing for SOYACONCEPT

USPTO serial 79065046

SOYACONCEPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOYACONCEPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul C. Jorgensen

Paul C. Jorgensen The Jorgensen Law Firm PLLC1250 24th Street, NWSuite 300Washingtond, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles and textile goods, namely, towels, cushion covers, kitchen towels, tea towels, bath linen, and bed and table coversSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely, jeans, trousers, coats, jackets, blouses, shirt jackets, skirts, dresses, pants, vests, waistcoats, jumpsuits, gloves, coveralls, overalls, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, bathing suits, underwear, ties, scarves, belts, socks and shawls; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, capsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 25, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 13, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance