Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79065046?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79065046. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SOYACONCEPT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79065046, the listed owner(s) include: Soya Concept A/S.

What is USPTO serial number 79065046?

Serial number 79065046 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SOYACONCEPT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SOYACONCEPT?

The public record lists International Classes: 014, 024, 025. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 79065046

SOYACONCEPT

Q: What is the current status of SOYACONCEPT?

SOYACONCEPT (79065046) currently shows USPTO status code 402 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402

Filing date: Dec 16, 2008
Status date: Dec 17, 2018
Registration date: —
Examiner: TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOYACONCEPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Soya Concept A/S
DK
Other trademarks owned by Soya Concept A/S

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul C. Jorgensen

Paul C. Jorgensen The Jorgensen Law Firm PLLC1250 24th Street, NWSuite 300Washingtond, DC 20037

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
014	Jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—
024	Textiles and textile goods, namely, towels, cushion covers, kitchen towels, tea towels, bath linen, and bed and table covers	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—
025	Clothing, namely, jeans, trousers, coats, jackets, blouses, shirt jackets, skirts, dresses, pants, vests, waistcoats, jumpsuits, gloves, coveralls, overalls, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, bathing suits, underwear, ties, scarves, belts, socks and shawls; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 6, 2019	DENA	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED	—
Jul 5, 2019	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Apr 25, 2019	ADCH	CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB	—
Nov 7, 2014	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Mar 19, 2011	FINT	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Mar 2, 2011	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Mar 2, 2011	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Aug 19, 2010	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Aug 5, 2010	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Aug 5, 2010	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Mar 3, 2010	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2010	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 2, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2009	ZZZX	PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN	—
Jul 13, 2009	PBCR	WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY	—
Jun 26, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 22, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jun 22, 2009	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Jun 22, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 22, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 22, 2009	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Jun 19, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 12, 2009	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jun 12, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 10, 2009	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Mar 16, 2009	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Mar 16, 2009	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Mar 14, 2009	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Mar 13, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 10, 2009	MAFR	APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED	—
Mar 6, 2009	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Mar 5, 2009	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—