Drawing for WATER WICKETTT

USPTO serial 79065710

WATER WICKETTT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3771702Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 6, 2010
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATER WICKETTT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVE.10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028sports and training apparatus for cricket games, namely, balls; board games; balls for games; ball games; balls for playing games; bats for games; batting gloves; cricket games; gloves for cricket ball games; outdoor activity games in the nature of cricket games; small balls for games; sticks for ball games; cricket game toys; water toys for playing cricket games in waterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 9, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 25, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 14, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 14, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 11, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 11, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 6, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 24, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 31, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 19, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance