USPTO serial 79065965
MELTIN'POT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3870235Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2010
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MELTIN'POT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER; GOODS OF LEATHER OR IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, NAMELY, BAGS, HANDBAGS, WALLETS, PURSES, TRAVELLING BAGS, SUITCASES, SHOPPING BAGS, OVERNIGHT CASES, DOCUMENT CASES, SPORTS BAGS, TRUNKS, TROLLEY BAGS FOR TRAVELLING, SHOULDER BAGS, TRAVELLING GARMENT BAGS, KEY CASES, BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS FOR HOLDING MUSIC, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, RUCKSACKS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS, WHIPS AND SADDLERY; COLLARS FOR DOGS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNDERWEAR, CAMISOLES, SPORTS JERSEYS, T-SHIRTS, TROUSERS, UNDERPANTS, ATHLETIC PANTS, SHORTS, SWEATERS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING CAPS, BATH ROBES, PAJAMAS, COATS, OVERCOATS, RAINCOATS, WAISTCOATS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, HEAVY JACKETS, JEANS, JACKETS, SKIRTS; KNITWEAR, NAMELY, KNIT SHIRTS, KNIT CAPS, KNIT GLOVES, WOVEN OR KNITTED UNDERWEAR; SHOULDER WRAPS, VEILS, SUITS, SPORTS SUITS, NAMELY, TRACK SUITS, JOGGING SUITS, SPORT SHIRTS, SPORT JACKETS, SPORT PANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, TIGHTS, PULLOVERS, DRESSES, GLOVES, SUSPENDERS, TIES, SHAWLS, SCARVES; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, VISORS, BANDANAS, HATS, CAPS; BELTS, WAIST BANDS, SWEAT BANDS, WRIST BANDS, CLOTHING POCKETS; FOOTWEAR | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |