Drawing for SUNBATH

USPTO serial 79066310

SUNBATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3757761Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 9, 2010
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNBATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIA C. ARCHER

JULIA C. ARCHER ENNS & ARCHER LLP939 BURKE STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial plant machinery for treating and engraving glass on a continuous basisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Furnaces for smelting and refining glass; thermic equipment for treating glass, namely, lehrsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Glass processing and heat treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 4, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 22, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 14, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 14, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 22, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2009CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 9, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 7, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance