USPTO serial 79066413
RANCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3995736Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2011
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RANCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan
JAMES V. COSTIGAN HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Accordions; mechanical, electric and electronic musical instruments; pianos; trumpets, violas, violins, violoncellos; harmonicas; harps; carillons; cymbals; bagpipes; flutes; gongs; bass drums; harpsichords; lyres; lutes, mandolas; mandolins; organs; barrel organs; saxophones; drums; kettledrums; trombones; tubas; musettes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RANCO ANTONIO DI RANCO GIUSEPPE
- Other trademarks owned by RANCO ANTONIO DI RANCO GIUSEPPE
- Other trademarks owned by RANCO ANTONIO DI RANCO GIUSEPPE
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named RANCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |