USPTO serial 79066459
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha K. Hoover
MARSHA K HOOVER DAVIS McGRATH LLC125 S WACKER STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cosmetic products, namely, cosmetic creams, shampoos, body and face lotions; perfumery; soaps; essential oils; hair lotions; dentifrices and dental care products, namely, toothpaste; non-medicated dental rinse | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | "Dermatological pharmaceutical products for use in the field of dermatology and cosmetic surgery and for application on skin in connection with radiation and chemotherapy; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; medical plasters; medical dressings; teeth filling materials, namely, fillings for teeth; dental impression materials; disinfectants for sanitary and hygienic purposes" | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |