USPTO serial 79067303
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James m. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sorting machines for various bulk goods; sorting machines using laser beams for sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material; sorting machines for processing of foodstuffs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Laser scanners for sorting purposes; computer programs for the control of machines for the industrial process of foodstuffs; cameras including charge-coupled device cameras used in the sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material; industrial X-ray apparatus for the sorting of goods, namely, containers and bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material, the foregoing not for medical purposes; lenses, lens diaphragms, optical mirrors, optical sensors and glass optical fibres, the aforementioned goods used in sorting apparatus; lasers, not for medical use, laser diodes, solid state lasers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Sorting of waste and recyclable materials, namely, separating waste and recyclable materials from bulk goods and bulk foodstuffs for the purpose of waste treatment and recycling ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific and technological services relating to the development of devices for sorting goods, namely, engineering, scientific research and design and testing of new products for others, industrial design; design and development of computer hardware, electronics in the nature of semiconductor chips, integrated-circuit chips, processor chips, and computer software for application in sorting apparatus ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |