Drawing for KADIA

USPTO serial 79069397

KADIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3811039Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KADIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. David Starr

H. David Starr Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Deburring machines, honing machines; deburring tools, brushing and honing tools, all being parts of machines for working metals, steel, and ceramics; diamond honing shafts, diamond honing stones, [ and diamond grinding and cutting discs ] all being parts of machinesACTIVE—
008Deburring tools, honing tools, diamond planing tools and diamond tools, namely, files and rasps; diamond honing shafts, diamond honing stones, [ and diamond grinding and cutting discs ] all aforementioned goods as hand toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 16, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 6, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 6, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 30, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 2, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 6, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 5, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 23, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 22, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance