Drawing for LSF

USPTO serial 79070169

LSF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LSF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ray Thomas

RAY THOMAS JR WENDEROTH LIND & PONACK LLPEAST 1030 15TH STREET NWSUITE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Nonferrous metals and their alloys, namely, copper alloys used for manufacturing valves and structural parts therefor, and copper alloy bars; and Metal valves, not being parts of machines, used for controlling the supply of liquids and gasesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 22, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 22, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 15, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 31, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance