USPTO serial 79070915
BENATTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENATTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R. VIGIL
THOMAS R. VIGIL THOMAS R. VIGIL LAW OFFICES319 BLUFF COURTLAKE BARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children in any kind of textile or material, namely, skirts, trousers, shorts, jeans, shirts, blouses, sweaters, pullovers, T-shirts, vests, suits, tracksuits, cloaks, coats, overcoats, bomber jackets, tunics, jackets, anoraks, waterproof clothing, namely, jackets and pants, stockings, socks, hats, headgear, namely, hats, caps and visors, scarves, gloves, neckties, swimsuits, belts, shoes, beach shoes, slippers, boots, gymnastic shoes, tennis shoes, bath robes, tights, underwear, and sportswear, namely, jackets and pants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |