USPTO serial 79072381
PRO MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3964397Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PRO MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
David W. Grace Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Vacuum cleaners for household use; accessories and parts for vacuum cleaners for household use, namely, vacuum cleaner brushes, vacuum cleaner hoses, vacuum cleaner bags; floor cleaning machines; clothes washing machines; electric clothing pressing machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric laundry irons [ and their replacement parts; sole plates for electric laundry irons ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Steam boilers for generating steam for ironing and their component parts; ventilation apparatus, namely, electric fans for personal use; air treatment apparatus, namely, ionization units for the treatment of air; air purification apparatus; electric air deodorizing apparatus; portable electric warm air dryers (not including electric hair dryers); air conditioning apparatus; apparatus for cooling, humidifying or dehumidifying air ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |