Drawing for FIVE LAKES

USPTO serial 79072520

FIVE LAKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3811129Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with FIVE LAKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn S. Lederman

Robyn S. Lederman Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033[ Aperitifs; brandy; wine; wine, namely, piquette; whisky; anisette, kirsch, ] vodka [ ; gin; liqueurs and spirits, namely, digestives; prepared alcoholic cocktails; anise; curacao, liqueurs; alcoholic beverages, except beer; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits; distilled spirits; hydromel, mead; peppermint liqueurs; alcoholic bitters; rum; sake; hard cider, perry; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic fruit extracts; alcoholic essences ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 25, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 24, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 21, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 29, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 8, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 1, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 6, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 30, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance