Drawing for MITACA

USPTO serial 79073956

MITACA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3853824Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2010
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MITACA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Coffee filters not of paper being part of electric coffee makers; electric coffee and cappuccino makers; electric coffee percolators; electric coffee pots; electric espresso machines; coffee roasters; electric tea kettles; electric tea potsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 20, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 5, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 5, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 10, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 18, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 21, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 6, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Nov 5, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance