USPTO serial 79073974
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Josh A. Partington
Josh A. Partington Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC11730 Plaza America Dr. #600Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Front end shovel loaders for tractors and other equipment-carrying vehicles; mechanical, hydraulic loading, lifting and digging equipment for tractors and other equipment-carrying vehicles, namely, front end loaders, back end loaders, grapples, forks, grapple buckets for moving earth and loose objects, silage forks, silage cutters, block trench cutters, bale splitters, pallet fork lifters, timber blades for moving earth and loose objects, timber forks in the nature of mechanical and hydraulic lifts, grab attachments in the nature of buckets, grapples and forks, big sack lifters in the nature of mechanical and hydraulic lifts, manure forks in the nature of lifting and moving equipment, potato forks in the nature of lifting and moving equipment, stone forks in the nature of lifting and moving equipment, root forks in the nature of lifting and moving equipment, bale spikes, bales forks, ploughs, mechanical sand spreaders, mechanical and hydraulic arms for use as bale carriers, structural parts for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Tractors; tractors with mechanical and hydraulic loading, lifting and digging equipment attached thereto, sold as a unit, and ] structural parts [ therefore ] * for tractors with mechanical and hydraulic loading, lifting and digging equipment attached thereto * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 3, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |