Drawing for PRO-ACT

USPTO serial 79074146

PRO-ACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3879241Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 23, 2010
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PRO-ACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Michael Hurst

J. Michael Hurst Keating Muething & Klekamp PLLOne East Fourth Street, Suite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Computer software and hardware for use in the control and operation of injection molding machines and subsystems of injection molding machines ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of injection molding machines and parts and fittings thereofACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design services relating to injection molding machines specifically industrial analysis, diagnostics in relation to control and operating apparatus for plastics injection molding machines; technical project studies, namely, engineering in relation to control and operation of plastics injection molding machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jun 10, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2022ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 6, 2022FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Sep 30, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 15, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 15, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 14, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 26, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 20, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 20, 2017REINREINSTATED—
Oct 27, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 20, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 13, 2017C7P.CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL—
Sep 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 5, 2017C7PFRQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED—
Sep 5, 2017ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Mar 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 11, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 23, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2010UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 11, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance