USPTO serial 79074771
INTENSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTENSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen C. Kassner
MAUREEN C. KASSNER PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO & NADEL LLPONE COMMERCE SQUARE2005 MARKET STREET, SUITE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | automatic electric coffee machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |