USPTO serial 79075513
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson, Esq. Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Strengthening supplements containing necessary vitamins and minerals for medical purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages enriched with vitamins and mineral salts, namely, energy drinks, isotonic beverages, high caloric value beverages, namely, energy drinks, protein beverages, namely, energy drinks, whey beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |